Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 02:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 113
56% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 186
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 86.2
57% 75.3 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 58.3
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 120 2.8 11 46 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 141
Write 62
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 41
18% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 9.1
43% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 85%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
590GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 27
SusWrite 28
39% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 782 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback