HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory59.5 GB free of 64.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 10:05
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 62.9
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 175
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 566
55% 453 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 76.8
51% 68.2 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 54.2
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 256
Write 243
Mixed 240
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 30.7
102% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 178
139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
111GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 93 95 96 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 237
Write 126
Mixed 163
SusWrite 95.6
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 27.3
92% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 67
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 80.4
66% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000NM0023 1TB
913GB free
Firmware: GS0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 185 184 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 165
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 183
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
255% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Buildwin Media-Player 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Read 7
Write 5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 5.3
8% 5.75 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.3
121% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2G70DB0-YK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70DB0-YK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70QH0-YK0 ID:80 CE M393B2G70QH0-YK0 98GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback