Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 19:37
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 134
59% 96 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 197
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 56.8
35% 43.5 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 38.1
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 326 228 220 208 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 423
Write 342
Mixed 315
SusWrite 252
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 60.2
51% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
266GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 129 130 123 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 122
Mixed 106
SusWrite 128
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 128 126 119 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 100
Write 116
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 123
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.3
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $375
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback