Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '16 at 22:40
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 131
48% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 399
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.70
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 46.5
27% 37.8 fps
MRender 46.5
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 34
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 490
Write 480
Mixed 404
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 21.1
86% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 80.5
74% 115 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HMS5C4040BLE640 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MPAOA5D0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 103
Write 110
Mixed 62.7
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.19
92% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 73%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 115
Write 109
Mixed 33.3
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.2
94% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
642GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 78.7
Write 83.6
Mixed 56
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.31
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
234GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 109
Write 113
Mixed 84.2
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.28
77% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 113%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
213GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 77.5
Mixed 33.7
79% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.25
34% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 30.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.1
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $378
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback