Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5Q  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081126
Uptime81.8 Days
Run DateDec 11 '16 at 11:16
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 67.1
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 133
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 194
Write 219
Mixed 186
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 14.1
91% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 15.4
24% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$87
150GB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 87
Mixed 73.4
68% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.48
98% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 75%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
87GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 28.8
Mixed 11.2
28% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.17
44% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback