HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 22:50
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 228
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 679
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 6.38
5% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 13.2
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 330 423 427 429 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 450
Mixed 331
SusWrite 409
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 33.9
111% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 282
229% 326 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 115%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
647GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 127 127 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 126
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback