Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 01:03
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 507
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Palit(1569 1187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 36.4
25% 32.2 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 32.9
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 315 315 315 315 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,123
Write 948
Mixed 584
SusWrite 355
168% 753 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 51.7
217% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 552
431% 594 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 159%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
314GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 159 158 159 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 117
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 157
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
65GB free
Firmware: CP100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 70 71 69 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 72
Write 73.9
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 69.8
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
157GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 143 108 135 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 159
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 133
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
278GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 115
Write 91.2
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 114
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 114%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB
164GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 31
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 32.8
43% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Corsair CMV8GX3M1A160 DDR3 1600 Corsair CMV8GX3M1A160 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback