Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 21:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 115
51% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 177
19% 151 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 9.88
6% 8.29 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.74
6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 83 80 78 87 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 239
Write 133
Mixed 164
SusWrite 87.6
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 27.7
107% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 106
86% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
266GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 66.3
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R734G1869U1S 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback