Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 17:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$290
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 139
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 355
40% 313 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 74 99 67 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 85.1
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
164GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 68.3
Write 63
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 116
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 69%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
16GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 14.3
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 15.4
21% 16 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
173% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Hp-pavilion VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback