Today's hottest deals

HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 21:21
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 126
51% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 166
24% 174 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 57.4
38% 48.8 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 39.9
40% 50 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 19 33 118 14 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.7% Below average
Read 180
Write 92.5
Mixed 122
SusWrite 51.8
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 87.8
85% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
2GB free
Firmware: SC13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.3
Write 58.8
Mixed 39
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
78GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 24.9
33% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 73%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
67GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 21
Mixed 21
SusWrite 25.8
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback