Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 12:10
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 146
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 370
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 830F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 1.34
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 50 109 109 110 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 236
Write 220
Mixed 204
SusWrite 89.3
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 27.7
93% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.6
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 46.5
38% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 120GB-$80
34GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 70 112 117 116 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 192
Write 194
Mixed 171
SusWrite 103
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 26.2
91% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 42.9
38% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 86%
H/W DISK 1 2TB
146GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 33
Write 28.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 0
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 49%
H/W DISK 2 320GB
122GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.19% Terrible
Read 31.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 3.3
26% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
H/W DISK 4 500GB
63GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28
Mixed 25
SusWrite 0
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 51%
H/W DISK 3 500GB
53GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 27.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 25.9
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 4
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback