Asrock FM2A88X Extreme6+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme6+  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 15:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 112
52% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 205
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 9
Parallax 12.7
0% 7.24 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 9.22
7% 8.88 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 320GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.7 3 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 3.4
5% 6.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.5
552% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 44%
Virtual Disk 429GB
66GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.1 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 6
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.5
6% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.5
253% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 14.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme6+ Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme6+ - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback