Asrock B450 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B450 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180619
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '19 at 18:02
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 246 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 751 76% 618 Pts	64-Core 967 60% 967 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 44.5 39% 49 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 62 49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 621 256 239 235 233 233 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,358 Write 1,471 Mixed 1,234 SusWrite 303 296% 1,342 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 69.8 235% 81.9 MB/s	DQ Read 903 DQ Write 664 DQ Mixed 840 613% 803 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 280%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 142 Write 175 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 110 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 108%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.7 3.1 3.7 5 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2.8 Write 0.3 SusWrite 4 3% 2.37 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 29 32 33 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 17.2 Write 8.7 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 32.8 29% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 2 87% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 39%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 377GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 86 86 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 87.2 Write 91.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 86.1 100% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 43%
mSD Card 128GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 88GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 57 58 59 60 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 89 Write 41.7 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 54.5 75% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.8 172% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 42%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 97GB free, PID 0731 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 161 164 165 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 166 Write 148 Mixed 81 SusWrite 164 185% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.7% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 26.3 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 22.8 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 1,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	368x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	308x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	149x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	141x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	96x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	39x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	38x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	108x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	104x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	101x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $401

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16