ACER Veriton X480

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemACER Veriton X480  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FG43D
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101217
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 68.9
40% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 74.8
8-Core 71.9
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 75.1
5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Sapphire(174B E193) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 4.9
3% 4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 200 210 231 232 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.7% Good
Read 249
Write 237
Mixed 239
SusWrite 215
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 34.3
112% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 38.5
72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 133%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 59 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 126
Write 94.3
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 60.5
91% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 52%
mSD Card 128GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 4.9 5.8 7.3 5.7 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 78.5
Write 11.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.1
22% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 42%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
34GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 59 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 56.3
Write 56
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 59.3
66% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton X480 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: ACER Veriton X480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $58
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback