Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3210-$70
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 156
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 220
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8460) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 128 145 151 156 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 159
Write 173
Mixed 78
SusWrite 147
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-033.A00LF 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback