PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170221 |
Uptime | 8.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 30 '19 at 15:08 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
61.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Device(1B4C 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 53 90 55 54 35 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
733GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 93 91 93 92 MB/s
|
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 137 135 135 137 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate BUP BL 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 17 16 15 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 14 14 MB/s
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elpida EG07011469-70 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 269x |
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 144x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |