Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '22 at 04:47
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209 3,580 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 184 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 527 54% 435 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 227C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.5% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 93.2 54% 76.6 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 44.9 46% 58 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FCCT128M4SSD1 128GB 470 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 177 178 185 182 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 466 Write 193 Mixed 227 SusWrite 175 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 99.3 4K Mixed 15.8 115% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 29.4 74% 158 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 73%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 831GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 126 126 126 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 135 Write 119 Mixed 102 SusWrite 125 89% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 4.3 5 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Read 41.2 Write 26.2 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 5 27% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB 4,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 18.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	484x
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	308x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	230x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	314x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	207x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	175x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	143x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	73x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	61x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	60x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $296	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350