Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10A8A18THC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10A8A18THC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory17.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141229
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 11:28
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 602
66% 519 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17
Parallax 19.9
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D3-120 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T161118b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 314 192 157 158 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.8% Good
Read 413
Write 275
Mixed 354
SusWrite 202
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 20.4
103% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.3
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 85.3
95% 153 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
298GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 61.1
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 101
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
255GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 105 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 101
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 102
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF Ramaxel RMR5030ED58E8W1600 99P5471-016.A00LF Ramaxel RMR5030ED58E8W1600 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback