Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111123
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '20 at 13:37
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 80.8 1-Core 41.6 2-Core 71.7 44% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 209 25% 194 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E152) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.32% Terrible	Lighting 7.73 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 6.12 6% 7.56 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 9.43 6% 7.54 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.32% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 525ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 70 75 68 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 220 Write 77.8 Mixed 118 SusWrite 69.7 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 20.5 72% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 92.1 69% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 69%
GB0250EAFYK 250GB 666 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 172GB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 111 112 113 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 113 Write 108 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 109 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 ACR256X64D3U13C9G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.2% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 8.1 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E900 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E900

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	45x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	15x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	12x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	41x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16