Today's hottest deals

MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C36
MotherboardMSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 10:45
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 312
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 1,084
91% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7000
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 44.6
25% 35.1 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 35.3
26% 30.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 255GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1256 1156 1221 1200 1214 956 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,609
Write 1,298
Mixed 881
SusWrite 1,167
329% 1,489 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 46.1
149% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 600
464% 644 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 252%
Great: 199%
Amd-raid DREVO X1 SSD 240GB
88GB free
Firmware: P051
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 218 222 127 76 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 336
Write 272
Mixed 276
SusWrite 158
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 2.5
17% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 57%
Trekstor DS picco SSD 128GB
88GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 106 139 114 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.9% Below average
Read 396
Write 139
Mixed 141
SusWrite 123
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 7.5
38% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 84.5
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 11.4
18% 37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 37%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG MZVLB512 512GB
237GB free
Firmware: EXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 978 602 605 606 606 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,825
Write 1,805
Mixed 1,547
SusWrite 828
337% 1,501 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 73.7
250% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 664
529% 718 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 234%
Great: 234%
Amd-raid ST3500630AS 500GB
343GB free
Firmware: 3.AF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 70 75 75 74 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 39.4
Write 69.5
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 71.6
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32%
Great: 40%
Amd-raid MAXTOR STM325031 250GB
163GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 78 77 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 51.3
Write 51.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 74.4
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
176% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 45%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3.1 3 3.2 3.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.1
7% 7.93 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVRB F4-3000C15-8GVR 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 25.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback