Today's hottest deals

MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C36
MotherboardMSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 11:03
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,061
98% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,475
91% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7000
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 44.7
25% 35.2 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 35.3
26% 30.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 255GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 611 590 456 355 320 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,224
Write 654
Mixed 658
SusWrite 440
165% 744 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 39.3
129% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 295
233% 330 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 132%
Great: 199%
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB
796GB free
Firmware: P3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 404 365 257 233 229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 880
Write 1,423
Mixed 959
SusWrite 315
202% 894 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 48
174% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 165
235% 410 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 132%
Great: 225%
Amd-raid DREVO X1 SSD 240GB
88GB free
Firmware: P051
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 337 136 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 434
Write 339
Mixed 341
SusWrite 172
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 20.9
72% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97.7
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 114
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%
Inateck ASM1153E 500GB
216GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 56 55 56 55 53 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.06% Terrible
Read 65.7
Write 54
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 55.8
13% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
3% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 76%
Amd-raid MAXTOR STM325031 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 53 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 80.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 53.4
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 45%
WD My Book 1130 2TB
918GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 103 100 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 63.1
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 101
98% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVRB F4-3000C15-8GVR 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 34.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 32.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $1,765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback