Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 00:48
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,087
98% 826 Pts
64-Core 2,166
134% 2,166 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 162
Parallax 317
115% 207 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 231
Splatting 160
144% 178 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 120%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 222 132 132 132 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 444
Mixed 363
SusWrite 199
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 53.2
176% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
152GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 248 247 247 245 244 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 319
Write 216
Mixed 173
SusWrite 247
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 24.3
111% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 54.5
80% 151 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB
856GB free
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 462 461 461 461 461 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 495
Write 453
Mixed 398
SusWrite 460
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 28.2
112% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 60.9
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 197
129% 148 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 136%
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB
177GB free
Firmware: P3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 35 34 84 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 701
Write 963
Mixed 820
SusWrite 121
147% 651 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 15
47% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 165
239% 418 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 225%
Amd-raid ADATA SX8200PNP 1TB
337GB free
Firmware: 42B2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 714 727 722 739 753 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 938
Mixed 958
SusWrite 759
204% 906 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 8.3
28% 8.3 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 421
405% 620 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 125%
Great: 297%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 151 157 156 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 190
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 155
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 30.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 29.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,075
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback