Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime27.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 115
48% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 185
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Sapphire(174B E253) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 28.2
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 36.5
23% 32.1 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 33.3
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 411
Write 312
Mixed 252
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 35.6
117% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 155
135% 202 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$49
427GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 164 165 164 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 133
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 164
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.7
324% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A2133C11 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback