Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5110 13 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	29.1% Poor	Memory 46.9 1-Core 18.2 2-Core 34.2 24% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 69.2 8-Core 61.2 9% 65.2 Pts	64-Core 70.2 4% 70.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 293GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.2 2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 103 Write 4.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 1.8 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 105%
Fujitsu M1636TAU 1GB 0GB free Firmware: 5045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.9% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 2.7 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 0.5 2% 2.05 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.17 MB/s

Seagate ST380021A 80GB 263 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 26GB free Firmware: 3.19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Read 1.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 1.4 1% 1.48 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 8 slots used 4GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.36% Terrible	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.9 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.36% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 32%, 155 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 45%, 279 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $100