HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory2.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 21:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5110
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 36.4
29% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 71.9
8-Core 73.1
10% 72.5 Pts
64-Core 73.1
4% 73.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3500
Nvidia(10DE 032B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 0.47
2% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 59 62 67 58 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 65.3
Mixed 48
SusWrite 59.5
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 40%
Samsung SP1603C 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: VL10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 52 51 52 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 50
Write 56.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 51.6
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback