Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 22:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
69% 128 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 732
64% 543 Pts
64-Core 3,344
207% 3,344 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 84.7
56% 74.1 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 57.5
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c86
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 352 350 348 350 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 343
Write 343
Mixed 298
SusWrite 351
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 22.9
89% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 190
143% 188 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 86.2
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 58.5
179% 62.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback