Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '20 at 20:57
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 136
52% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 533
47% 400 Pts
64-Core 2,482
154% 2,482 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 33.9
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 30
Splatting 27
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 23 17 18 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 102
Write 40.3
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 19.5
13% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 11.7
63% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 19.6
DQ Mixed 11.7
42% 101 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 123%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 37
Write 5.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 4.9
15% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.2
125% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 47.4
142% 49.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 120%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback