Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6006U 47,111 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 120 51% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 177 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 530 3,164 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Legend(17AA 3816) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	6.35% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 10.8 7% 10.3 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 7.93 Splatting 6.65 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.35% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 65 78 48 105 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 412 Write 324 Mixed 204 SusWrite 77.6 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 9 52% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 67.5 DQ Mixed 39.9 44% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 366GB free Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 95 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 60.3 Write 92.7 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 96.1 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ V01D4S44GB52F52F2400 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.8% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 18.8 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 520IntelBench 4%, 9,911 samples	353x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	208x
HD Graphics 510IntelBench 2%, 6,504 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GBBench 57%, 1,308 samples	19x
SSDSC2KF128G8L 128GBIntelBench 64%, 1,307 samples	14x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	70x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 2,334 samples	61x
M471A5244BB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 3,449 samples	37x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28