Lenovo 80TL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80TL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 15:27
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 98.2
49% 77 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 168
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 520
Legend(17AA 3802) 1GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 0.2
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 56 2.3 142 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 437
Write 311
Mixed 208
SusWrite 102
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 12.3
61% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 40.3
43% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
71GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 71 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 46.3
Write 71.3
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 73.3
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ V01D4S44GB52F52F2400 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 6R 1G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 19% 81 129 81 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO71EC
History: Score 21: 3R 1G 3B | Score 50: 7R 3G 6B | Score 40: 5R 3G 6B | Score 41: 6R 1G 8B
Typical 80TL Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback