Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 124
2-Core 221
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 512
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4187
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 22.7
18% 22.3 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 21
Splatting 19
18% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 246 238 239 240 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,301
Write 801
Mixed 570
SusWrite 272
163% 736 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68.8
212% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 363
337% 526 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 271%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
266GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 122 129 128 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 48
Write 114
Mixed 55
SusWrite 125
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback