Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85FA
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 02:40
Run Duration400 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 11.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 204
50% 105 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 562
54% 444 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 85FA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 6.3
5% 16.7 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 223 210 197 177 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 915
Write 786
Mixed 726
SusWrite 241
149% 667 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 43.5
140% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 492
384% 532 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 120%
Great: 235%
Hitachi HTS545050B9SA00 500GB
229GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 68 66 73 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 55.5
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 68.3
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 46%
GARMIN VIRB SD CARD 32GB
19GB free, PID 2002
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 6.7 6.9 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Read 8.4
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.8
8% 6.27 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 3.9
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 388
10% 388 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx Builds (Compare 5,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback