PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7599 |
Motherboard | MSI 870-C45 (MS-7599) (all builds) |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101210 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '20 at 23:37 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
42%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 41 39 30 19 19 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
466GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 90 108 76 76 76 MB/s
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$61
51GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 50 55 47 55 55 MB/s
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung STORY Station 1.5TB
7GB free, PID 5f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 23 21 22 21 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 9905403-137.A00LF 9905403-137.A00LF 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 14x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X4 840AMD $150Bench 47%, 5,147 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 5x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 51% - Above average | Total price: $203 |