Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 06:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 274
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As340 120GB 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 63 54 66 61 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 390
Write 367
Mixed 142
SusWrite 69.8
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 12
39% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 18.5
48% 102 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
191GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 79.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 73
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 066D TC44G21S815 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback