Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1520 x 709 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime88.6 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 19:46
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 166
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 335
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 176 182 189 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
99GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 182 176 183 191 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
48GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 175 183 191 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 172 180 188 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 437
Write 236
Mixed 249
SusWrite 179
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 21.4
80% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 403
272% 327 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
178GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 203 206 212 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 32.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback