Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C655D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite C655D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 00:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 43.4
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 23.7
20% 26.5 Pts
4-Core 23.8
8-Core 23.9
3% 23.8 Pts
64-Core 24.7
2% 24.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Toshiba(1179 FDE8) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.88 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 65 66 65 69 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 131
Write 78.1
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 67.8
21% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 5.2
19% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.2
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 3.5
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C655D Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C655D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback