Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

EVGA NF66

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	NVIDIA NF66
Motherboard	EVGA NF66 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080904
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '20 at 02:14
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$54 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 45.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 79.2 1-Core 42.7 2-Core 84.8 46% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 84.9 8-Core 84.9 11% 84.9 Pts	64-Core 85.5 5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3482) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 5.73 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 1.94 5% 5.4 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.96 5% 6.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC300S37A4 480GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 284GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507K SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 61 61 61 80 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.1% Very poor	Read 121 Write 95.8 Mixed 109 SusWrite 65.2 22% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 9.5 33% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 31%
Hitachi HDP725032GLA 320GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 293GB free Firmware: GM3O SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 71 77 77 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 81.1 Write 83.2 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 74.7 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	20% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 4.8 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback