Today's hottest deals

EVGA NF66

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemNVIDIA NF66
MotherboardEVGA NF66  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 03:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$54
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 45.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 84.9
46% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 85.4
11% 84.8 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 15.4
15% 16 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 18.4
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC300S37A4 480GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507K
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
Read 123
Write 105
Mixed 115
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 12.6
60% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47.8
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 16.1
18% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%
Hitachi HDP725032GLA 320GB
185GB free
Firmware: GM3O
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 74.1
Write 74.2
Mixed 76.8
57% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback