Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 94
2-Core 168
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 454
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.4
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 83.2
52% 68.1 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 55.8
Splatting 74.7
53% 62.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 480GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q082
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 96 88 92 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 326
Write 211
Mixed 239
SusWrite 104
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 29.9
38% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 101%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
52GB free
Firmware: 1.3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 36 33 44 33 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 146
Write 93.2
Mixed 120
SusWrite 38.8
22% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 19.8
73% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 39.4
43% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
206GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 105 105 105 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 98.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 103
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
717GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 133 136 135 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 134
70% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72%
Great: 84%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
50GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 56 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 38.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 54.2
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback