Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '20 at 05:24
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 69.1 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 169 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 579 54% 450 Pts	64-Core 867 54% 867 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.9% Good	Lighting 98.7 Reflection 96 Parallax 81.8 80% 92.1 fps	MRender 84.7 Gravity 49.2 Splatting 43.4 46% 59.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 8,185 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 594GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 776 951 940 718 188 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,808 Write 991 Mixed 858 SusWrite 694 241% 1,088 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 35.3 122% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 479 DQ Mixed 446 317% 396 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 297%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 223GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 189 100 90 89 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 399 Write 357 Mixed 319 SusWrite 138 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 27.4 90% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 186 171% 262 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown? CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 2x8GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.5% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 24.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $392

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16