Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M5100  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer F690GVM
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070927
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 11:14
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 33.6
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 60.5
25% 41.6 Pts
4-Core 60.2
8-Core 60.1
8% 60.2 Pts
64-Core 60.3
4% 60.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon X1200
Device(105B 0E0A) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.23
0% 0.25 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hy-vs-820 PRO 120G 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 911XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 43 12 60 14 57 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 137
Write 45.8
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 33.4
17% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 4
42% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 5.8
12% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
448GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 45 45 45 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 74.8
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 44.2
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 51%
JMicron Tech 500GB
128GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 23 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 17.3
Write 20.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 22
28% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5100 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback