Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 862
86% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.7% Very good
Lighting 94.3
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 88.2
77% 93.9 fps
MRender 84
Gravity 85.7
Splatting 79.7
68% 83.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 27 24 22 24 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 498
Write 481
Mixed 182
SusWrite 26.6
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 22.5
116% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 63.9
87% 168 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 118%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
39GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 38 135 58 79 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 514
Write 450
Mixed 28
SusWrite 120
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 0.8
61% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 12.1
29% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 100%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
753GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49% Average
Read 84
Write 80.8
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 86.2
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49%
Great: 63%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
9GB free
Firmware: 04.01G02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 60 82 84 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 64.2
Write 67.8
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 75.7
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 24.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback