Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 19:20
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 502
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 605
38% 605 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 42 68 73 43 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 402
Write 360
Mixed 319
SusWrite 54.2
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 33
108% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 73.7
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 54.9
71% 122 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
37GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 175 177 173 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 174
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 176
100% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
50GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 158 154 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 153
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 165
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$106
142GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 116 115 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 123
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 116
72% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$106
253GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 140 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 140
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
225GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 59 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 86.5
Write 51
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 58.1
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/8GX 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.4% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 22.3
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback