Dell Precision M4500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Precision M4500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RRH3K
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120509
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateJan 02 '17 at 00:07
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 101
56% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 203
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M
Dell(1028 040C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 1.28
2% 3.11 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 3.52
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM800 2.5" 128GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM25D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 208
Write 56.4
Mixed 111
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 6.25
4K Mixed 4.65
26% 7.25 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
600GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 20.2
Mixed 22.4
28% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
39GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 19.1
Mixed 21.2
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 2TB
5GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 19.1
Mixed 21.1
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4500 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback