QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	47.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 47.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	43.4 GB free of 47.2275 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '20 at 18:33
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	63%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 9 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 57 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 132 51% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 449 44% 359 Pts	64-Core 612 38% 612 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.6% Below average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 48.8 Parallax 41.2 39% 45.9 fps	MRender 51.8 Gravity 50 Splatting 50 41% 50.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 550GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 491GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 151 1.1 0.1 2.1 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 436 Write 260 Mixed 339 SusWrite 92.3 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 6.6 22% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 550GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 512GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 396 131 44 4.5 1.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 394 Write 348 Mixed 349 SusWrite 160 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 5.5 19% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 47GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 0, 0, 0 MHz 16384, 16384, 15593 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.8% Average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 20.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.2 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 178%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16