QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	123.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '23 at 07:29
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 32 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 63 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 190 63% 115 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 686 64% 535 Pts	64-Core 3,134 194% 3,134 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 9.2 Parallax 5.6 6% 7.2 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 7 7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 550GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 465GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 583 542 520 495 491 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 551 Write 477 Mixed 437 SusWrite 521 112% 496 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 15.6 52% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 247 208% 303 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 8x16GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 82 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 44.7 158% 55.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 249%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	46	12	60	24"	1280 720	ACI2493 VE247

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16