Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161117
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 18:19
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 415
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 66.4
57% 68.2 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 68.3
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 119 92 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 423
Write 286
Mixed 249
SusWrite 90.6
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 8.3
89% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 12.8
49% 104 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 88%
Verbatim USB External SSD 128GB
73GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 83 84 86 73 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 351
Write 78.2
Mixed 124
SusWrite 77.5
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 10.8
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 4.3
23% 53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
579GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 37
Mixed 34
SusWrite 39.3
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 169 169 171 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 181
Write 180
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 169
184% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback