Lenovo 20NFS05R00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20NFS05R00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NFS05R00
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 06:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 146
54% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 509
47% 395 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28.08
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 14.7
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.5
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G-1001 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20240001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 216 217 218 218 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 910
Write 754
Mixed 710
SusWrite 233
146% 652 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 40.3
171% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 433
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 265
251% 390 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 123%
Great: 140%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
411GB free
Firmware: AV0D2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 122 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 122
69% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 69%
SDXC 128GB
86GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 59 58 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 23.6
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback