Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20KV0014KD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20KV0014KD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KV0014KD
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 07:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 216
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 511
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 506F) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 18.40.12.15
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 14.6
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 13.8
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 296 293 297 295 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,403
Write 1,040
Mixed 681
SusWrite 324
191% 862 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 57
197% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 673
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 636
474% 630 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 165%
Great: 236%
SDXC 128GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 78 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 81
Write 76.5
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 78.3
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.7
494% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback