Asus M4A785TD-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A785TD-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '14 at 17:45
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 130
44% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 254
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 41% Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 8.88
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 21.8
7% 16.3 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 55.5
35% 40.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 129
Mixed 9.24
66% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.43
142% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
484GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 45.6
Write 12.2
Mixed 3.97
15% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 76%
PNY Tech USB 2.0 FD 8GB
4GB free, PID 004f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 8.03
Mixed 8.18
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.73
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.006
14% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 6%
Typical M4A785TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback