Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M1200/3200/5200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M1200/3200/5200  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer RS780HVF
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091201
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 16:05
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 5200B
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 45
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 39.2
27% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 65.8
6% 53.1 Pts
64-Core 68
4% 68 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Nvidia(10DE 05CC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.87
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 68 86 70 103 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 69.5
Write 108
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 82.1
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M1200/3200/5200 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1200/3200/5200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback